Arsene Wenger was never going to be a 'catalyst for change' after 10 years of Arsenal slippage

In all the Premier League’s 25 seasons, no top side has stood on a Monday morning so roundly condemned. On social media, one Arsenal fan took a carving knife and a meat cleaver to his replica shirt to remove the crest, with its canon now firing cotton wall balls. Not a single pundit could draw one ray of encouragement from either the performance or Arsenal’s political predicament, in which Alexis Sanchez, Mesut Oil and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain have been allowed to arrive in the red zones of their contracts, ,with Oxlade-Chamberlain seemingly on his way to Chelsea.

Graeme Souness, on Sky, was the most colourful. "I have officially given up on them," Souness said. "In the past, there has been something about them to like and you want them to show you that they have turned the corner, but what I saw today was they have taken one giant step back. That is a performance that gets the manager the sack. For professional players to accept that performance is beyond belief. Arsenal were wishy-washy, weak-willed, pussy-footed, and those are the nice things I can say about them.”

A late summer squall of bad transfer market dealing and poor contract management would be survivable, just about, though Sanchez leaving would be the worst of all outcomes on the playing side. But all the arrows are pointing the wrong way - and have been for most of the last 10 years. From an absentee owner who appears to want a quiet life while milking the league’s vast TV revenues right down to a team who exploit the excessive loyalty of their manager, Arsenal are an institutionalised comfort zone. 

This season they start a European campaign outside the Champions League for the first time since 1997-98. Thursday’s closing of the transfer window will not bring relief. Three days after their Europa League debut against Cologne, on Thursday 14 September, they travel to Chelsea, who inflicted another mortifying defeat on Wenger: 6-0, in his 1,000th game in charge. Another was the 8-2 defeat at Manchester United in 2011 at this stage of the season.

Even the reaction to those two hammerings fell short of the shellacking Arsenal have taken since Sunday’s defeat at Anfield, which inflamed doubts about the soul of the team, the real purpose of the club and of course Wenger’s role as the last manager who gets to dictate the terms of his own employment - and when he might walk away.

The immediate context to this turmoil - beyond the 10 years of slippage - is a declaration in April by Izan Gazidis, the chief executive, that Wenger could be a “catalyst for change.” Gazidis was clearly reading a different Arsene Wenger biography to the rest of us. When the subject of a director of football coming in was raised, Wenger did his best lemon-sucking expression and said: “No. I don’t know what director of football means. Is it somebody who stands in the road and directs play right and left? I don’t understand and I never did understand what it means.”

Any momentum for change was halted by Wenger’s recalcitrance and the FA Cup win, which he used to make himself seem impregnable again. But then summer came, the contracts carried on rolling down, the bidders lined up for Sanchez and Oxlade-Chamberlain, tactical confusion returned and the team returned to Premier League action with even less conviction than before. Result: two defeats in three.

As important players agitate to leave, who, among Europe’s top operators, would be badgering their agent this week to fix a move to a club who capitulated against Liverpool, and who are stuck in delusion-loop?  Imagine, for example, how Lacazette feels now.